Case studies

4,041 pieces of gear, one sticker each, full history on a phone scan.

Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU)Education · Inventory solution

At Middle Tennessee State University's recording program, a microphone's serial, cost, and repair history meant hunting the right row across repeated FileMaker exports. Now a staffer scans the sticker and reads it on a phone: a decade of tangled inventory cleaned, all 4,041 items coded, the scanner built behind it.

A recording studio control room in warm light: a large mixing console and a monitor seen through the glass.
4,041items tagged, scannable, reconciled
scan → historyserial, cost, and repairs in seconds
>50% of costrepair-cost flag for replacement review

One record per item, a scan away

A unique printable code on every piece of gear, and a phone that turns a scan into the item's full history.

01

A unique code on every one of 4,041 items

Every item carries its own printable Code-128 label, so a piece of gear identifies itself instead of being matched to a spreadsheet row by hand.

What changedStaff stopped hunting for the right row; the tag is the lookup.

A printed equipment label: a Code-128 barcode over tag number 1024 and the model name, in the Microphones category. Record shown is demo data.
02

A phone is the scanner

No dedicated barcode gun. A staffer opens the app, points a phone camera at the tag, or types it, and the scanner reads Code-128, QR, and the rest.

What changedChecking gear takes the phone in a pocket, not new hardware.

The scanner app on a phone: a camera viewport, a Start Camera button noting it reads QR, Code-128, and other symbologies, and a manual tag-entry field.
03

Scan a tag, get the whole record

One scan returns the item's maker, model, serial, location, acquisition cost, and full service history, in seconds.

  • One record holds everything, so no one reconciles a serial in one export against a cost in another.
  • When recorded repair spend passes half an item's purchase price, the record flags it, so repair-or-replace is a decision staff can see.

What changedA lookup returns one trustworthy record instead of several conflicting rows.

An equipment record pulled by tag: status, location, serial, model, acquisition cost, acquired date, and vendor for a studio condenser mic. The record shown is demo data, not a real asset.

How the record stays trustworthy

A scanner is only as good as the data under it. The rebuild put the integrity in the record itself, not in whoever remembered the spreadsheet.

  • Item records were split from audit history and reduced to one row per tag, so a lookup can only return a single, unambiguous record.
  • The cleaned workbook was mirrored into a database rather than left as another spreadsheet to drift out of sync.
  • Repair spend is tracked against purchase cost, so the replace-or-repair line is a number on the record, not a memory.

What the cleanup produced

Reconciled records brought equipment lookup and service history into one place.

  • All 4,041 devices were tagged and reconciled into a shared record from the old FileMaker exports.
  • A lookup now returns one trustworthy record instead of several conflicting spreadsheet rows.
  • Service history and repair cost live against the item, so a phone scan surfaces them in seconds.

What the approach changed

We made the inventory the program already had easy to reconcile and reach from a phone. The cleaned records carried both the lookup and the service history. The useful step was making existing information trustworthy and findable, not stacking a new system on top of a mess.

Ready to take the next steps?

Send us a message and a member of our team will get back to you.